The Federal Government has tightened controls over the deployment and redeployment of civil servants across Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), directing authorities to stop moving officers from recognised professional pools without approval from the appropriate posting authorities.
The directive was issued by the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (OHCSF) as the administration of President Bola Tinubu intensifies its crackdown on fake government agencies, ghost workers and weaknesses in the Federal Government’s personnel and institutional control systems.
In a circular dated August 24, 2026, with reference number HCSF/3065/V.I/275, the OHCSF warned that officers posted to MDAs from recognised professional pools must remain in the offices, departments, divisions, units or sections to which they were specifically assigned unless their deployment is reviewed and approved by the relevant authority.
The circular was addressed to the Chief of Staff to the President, ministers, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, permanent secretaries, service chiefs, the Inspector-General of Police and heads of major Federal Government institutions and agencies.
The OHCSF said it had observed that some MDAs were disregarding existing rules by redeploying officers posted to them from professional pools without obtaining approval from the relevant posting authorities.
The office said the practice contravened an earlier circular, referenced HCSF/3065/VI/218 and dated January 2, 2025, which prohibited the internal redeployment of pool officers within MDAs.
The latest circular stated that officers posted to MDAs by the OHCSF or another recognised professional pool must remain in their approved locations in accordance with their posting instructions.
It added that such officers could not be redeployed internally without the prior approval of the authority responsible for their posting.
However, the OHCSF made an exception for officers on Grade Levels 07 to 14 who are posted to fill vacancies in departments.
According to the directive, such officers may be deployed internally to divisions, units or sections where vacancies exist, provided the deployment remains within the scope of their respective professional pools or cadres.
Where operational circumstances require a change to an officer’s posting, the OHCSF said the matter must be referred to the appropriate posting authority for review and approval.
The circular ended with a firm instruction to all affected authorities to ensure strict compliance.
The circular also provided a breakdown of recognised professional pools and the authorities responsible for managing them.
Under the OHCSF, the recognised cadres include Administrative Officers, Executive Officers (General), Store Officers, Stock Verifier Officers, Confidential Secretaries, System/Programme Analysts, Statistical/Data Processing Officers and Library Officers.
These officers are managed by the Permanent Secretary, Career Management Office of the OHCSF.
The Federal Ministry of Justice manages the pool of State Counsels, under the Solicitor-General/Permanent Secretary.
The Bureau of Public Procurement manages Procurement Officers, while the Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation manages Information, Press and Public Relations Officers.
At the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, the recognised cadres include Account Officers and Executive Officers (Accounts), while the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation manages Resident Auditors.
The circular also recognised other duly established professional pool offices and their applicable cadres and managing authorities.
The detailed structure reinforces the principle that professional officers posted to MDAs operate within defined administrative arrangements and cannot simply be moved from one establishment to another at the discretion of individual officials.
The latest directive comes amid growing concern over how purported government bodies have allegedly acquired the appearance of official legitimacy and interacted with government institutions.
President Tinubu on August 28, 2026, approved a comprehensive forensic audit of the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS), Federal Government agencies, ministries and their internal control systems.
According to the Presidency, the exercise followed an August 19 Federal Executive Council resolution based on findings by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) concerning fake agencies, ghost workers and other control failures.
The audit will investigate how fictitious or ineligible persons were enrolled on government systems and examine identity, biometric and bank-account controls.
It will also establish a definitive inventory of Federal Government agencies, departments, commissions, councils, parastatals and other bodies, while verifying their legal basis and how they obtained official recognition, budgetary consideration, office facilities and access to government systems.
The Federal Government’s latest personnel controls follow a series of revelations involving purported government agencies.
In July, Tinubu ordered the ICPC to investigate the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council after the Presidency declared that the body was fictitious and had never been established by the Federal Government.
The subsequent ICPC investigation found that the purported council had no legal basis and that an appointment letter used by its promoter was allegedly forged.
The investigation also raised concerns about how the organisation was able to operate around government structures and allegedly gain access to official processes.
The controversy widened on August 21, when the ICPC announced the discovery of another purported federal agency, the National Brands Development and Made in Nigeria Special Project Office.
The commission alleged that the organisation was promoted by George Nwabueze, with the suspected involvement of senior public servants in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation.
Tinubu subsequently ordered the promoter’s arrest and the suspension of three permanent secretaries in the OSGF.
The revelations have raised broader questions about how purported government agencies could obtain office accommodation, correspondence privileges, budgetary recognition, access to government systems and potentially government personnel.
The comprehensive forensic audit is expected to go beyond individual cases and examine systemic weaknesses in personnel and institutional management.
The Presidency said the exercise would examine the interfaces between IPPIS and other government platforms, including the Government Integrated Financial Management Information System, Remita, the Treasury Single Account and the Sub-Treasury Single Account.
It will also determine whether weaknesses resulted from system defects, process failures, inadequate segregation of duties or deliberate circumvention of established controls.
According to the Presidency, the audit is intended to strengthen the architecture of government, close systemic loopholes, improve data verification and reconciliation, reinforce accountability and ensure that only duly constituted entities and eligible personnel have access to government resources.
READ MORE: Tinubu: Reforms Have Put Nigeria on Path to $1tn Economy by 2030
Against this backdrop, the OHCSF circular provides another layer of administrative control by requiring that the movement of professional pool officers be traceable to an authorised posting authority.
It also places responsibility on permanent secretaries and heads of MDAs to ensure that officers are not arbitrarily moved away from their approved postings.
Although the circular does not specifically state that it was issued because of the fake-agency investigations, its emphasis on recognised professional pools, approved establishments, authorised posting authorities and strict compliance comes as the Federal Government moves to address institutional weaknesses exposed by the recent scandals.
The directive effectively seeks to prevent civil servants from being moved into unauthorised establishments through informal administrative arrangements, while making the relevant professional pool authorities the gatekeepers of such deployments.