Sani said the PDP had complied with the court’s decision by establishing an interim National Working Committee and notifying INEC within the period prescribed by law. “We abided by that judgment. That’s why we constituted an interim National Working Committee and wrote to INEC. We did it within the window provided by law.” On concerns that the PDP could fail to appear on the ballot ahead of the 2027 general election, Sani insisted there was still hope for the party. “Once the matter is concluded, notwithstanding the outcome, the rebuilding process will begin. Most people do not believe in the current recognised PDP because it is just a contraption. It is not the original PDP and it is not what the founding fathers gave to us.” He expressed confidence that the party would survive the ongoing legal battles. “We believe the PDP will appear on the ballot. There is hope because the process has begun. If the courts interpret the judgments in favour of the Board of Trustees, then the party is recovered, and once the party is recovered, the rebuilding process begins.” Sani maintained that the PDP remained Nigeria’s only surviving legacy political party. “It is the only legacy party that is still standing, and we do not believe that the PDP will die. That is why all of us are putting in our best to ensure that the party survives and continues to wax stronger.” Responding to questions about the party’s presidential candidate, Sani dismissed concerns over the absence of a formal acceptance. “Our presidential candidate is there. You have never heard him deny that he is the presidential candidate. You have never heard him say he is not interested.” He argued that the candidate’s silence should not be interpreted as rejection. “If he has not accepted, he has also not rejected. And in law, silence constitutes consent.” On why the Board of Trustees sought a Federal High Court interpretation of the Supreme Court judgment, Sani said the objective was simply to compel INEC to implement what the PDP believed was already decided. “We have written to INEC, asking it to amend its documentation and recognise Turaki. INEC believes the judgment is in its favour, while we believe it is in ours. We are asking the court to interpret the judgment and direct INEC to do the appropriate thing. Simple and short.”

PDP Chieftain Says Legal Disputes Will Strengthen Party Ahead of 2027

Share post

A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Umar Sani, has expressed optimism that Nigeria’s main opposition party will emerge stronger from its ongoing leadership crisis, insisting that the legal battles currently before the courts do not signal the end of the party.

Speaking during an interview on ARISE NEWS on Tuesday, Sani described the internal disagreements within the PDP as “family matters” that are being addressed through the judicial process. He maintained that the party’s rebuilding would begin once the courts deliver final interpretations of the disputed judgments.

According to him, the PDP Board of Trustees (BoT) approached the courts after formally writing to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), requesting the recognition of the Kabir Tanimu Turaki-led faction based on what it considers existing judgments of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

Sani explained that the matter before the Federal High Court is not an attempt to reopen previously decided cases but rather a request for judicial interpretation of existing rulings and directives to INEC on how they should be implemented.

He argued that the case is focused solely on clarifying the meaning of earlier court judgments, stressing that it should not be viewed as an internal party dispute.

The PDP stalwart also criticised the Federal High Court’s handling of the matter, saying the judge misunderstood the nature of the application before the court. He maintained that the party only sought an interpretation of previous appellate judgments and a directive compelling INEC to recognise the Turaki-led faction if the court agreed with its position.

Addressing concerns over the Supreme Court judgment that nullified the Ibadan convention organised by the Turaki-led faction, Sani argued that the ruling also had implications for the opposing faction within the party.

According to him, the Supreme Court’s decision effectively questioned the authority of individuals acting on behalf of both factions. He further stated that the Court of Appeal had also raised issues regarding the legitimacy of another convention, noting that questions remained over where the election was held, how it was conducted, and who participated in the process.

Sani said the PDP complied with the court’s directives by constituting an interim National Working Committee (NWC) and formally notifying INEC within the legal timeframe.

Despite growing concerns over the party’s future and its participation in the 2027 general election, Sani expressed confidence that the PDP would remain on the ballot.

He said the rebuilding process would commence once the legal disputes are resolved, regardless of the eventual outcome, adding that many party members believe the currently recognised leadership does not reflect the vision of the PDP’s founding members.

Describing the PDP as Nigeria’s only surviving legacy political party, Sani insisted that members remain committed to preserving and strengthening the organisation despite its current challenges.

READ MORE: Tinubu Urges United ECOWAS Stand Against Xenophobic Attacks

On questions surrounding the party’s presidential candidate, he dismissed suggestions that the absence of a formal public acceptance amounted to a rejection.

Sani argued that the candidate had never denied being the party’s flag bearer, adding that, in his interpretation, silence should not automatically be construed as refusal.

He reiterated that the Board of Trustees is asking the Federal High Court to interpret previous judgments and direct INEC to recognise what it believes is the legally valid leadership of the party.

According to Sani, both the PDP and INEC have differing interpretations of the court rulings, making judicial clarification necessary to resolve the dispute and provide certainty ahead of future political activities.

Exit mobile version